Commons:Deletion requests/File:Man sex organ.JPG

Uninteresting photography : abundant pictures of the same penis. Best alternatives. Commons isn't a porn blog : COM:NUDE. ~ FAP (talk) 13:38, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

•  Keep - I think it's useful to have several pictures of the same penis. This is good quality photography, the guy isn't recognisable and it is own work. There is no good reason for deletion. -mattbuck (Talk) 13:42, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
•  Delete Too many. Another pictures of the same author delated here. Florent Pécassou (talk) 14:25, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  Note: Nominator is a sockpuppet of the above user. -mattbuck (Talk) 20:13, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  Yes, I'd also like those undeleted please. -mattbuck (Talk) 14:31, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Comment - author's other penis pictures now undeleted. -mattbuck (Talk) 10:42, 9 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

•  Delete -- Useless, per nom. Alvesgaspar (talk) 10:36, 28 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
•  Keep -- Usefull, neutral picture. Not per nomination sock and its string holder Florent Pécassou. -- ／人◕ ‿‿ ◕人＼ 苦情処理係 19:27, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
•  Delete Per nom, regardless we have socks here or not. Just another "hey, watch my dick" pic. --Yikrazuul (talk) 20:35, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
•  Delete Per Yikrazuul. Some photos of non-notable faces are deleted every day as not in project scope. Just a penis is far more important? I can't see a general difference between faces and penises in DR case. Typical self-promotional junk by uploader, like a some others non-notable private photos. With best regards and friendly to all in this really hot dispute. -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 13:34, 30 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Has a dog, a car or a penis to be notable to be kept? -- ／人◕ ‿‿ ◕人＼ 苦情処理係 14:25, 30 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    • Low-quality photos of a pets typically nominated in DR. -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 14:49, 30 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
      • But this is no low quality image. What is the difference? -- ／人◕ ‿‿ ◕人＼ 苦情処理係 14:59, 30 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • We have a lot of portraits of non-notable people, if they are of a good quality (e.g. today's POTD is one of them). Trycatch (talk) 02:28, 10 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
•  Keep Oh, these censorship-driven DRs are so tiresome. It's just a neutral photograph of a penis, it's not sexual in any way, just a photograph of a part of the human anatomy. A good quality photograph, don't see a reason for deletion. Trycatch (talk) 02:28, 10 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: doesn't add anything educational to the existing collection of penises Jcb (talk) 21:00, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]