Commons:Deletion requests/File:Human male genital- prepuce.jpg

spam 21wine (talk) 22:26, 12 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep. spam is not an accurate designation, not a valid deletion rationale in this case. the only "spam" here, is by the nominating user, who has spammed deletion noms of "dirty" pictures, with invalid, 1-2 word, zero-effort rationales for deletion. i'm getting very tired of responding to the spurious rational nominations of this user. the nominating user has contributed nothing but deletion noms, & their account appears to be currently inactive.also; photo is part of a set, & should be kept as such. Lx 121 (talk) 07:04, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Kept. Justass (talk) 17:38, 13 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Uninteresting photography : abundant pictures of the same penis. Best alternatives. Commons isn't a porn blog : COM:NUDE. ~ FAP (talk) 13:36, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

•  Delete Another pictures of the same author delated here. Florent Pécassou (talk) 14:26, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  Please note the nominator is a sockpuppet of the above user. -mattbuck (Talk) 14:26, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

•  Delete -- Useless. Alvesgaspar (talk) 10:32, 28 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
•  Keep - Not useless, it's part of a set of high quality images of the same penis. Uninteresting is not a deletion criteria, nor is abundant pictures, or better alternatives, nor is "not a porn blog". -mattbuck (Talk) 14:28, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted - doesn't add anything educational to the existing collection of penises - Jcb (talk) 20:58, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]