User talk:nclm
TUSC token dace9924668525700a71d3a0e85c1b9c
[edit]I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!
File:Wallace_Square.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Justass (talk) 17:53, 12 December 2009 (UTC)
File:World_of_Goo_Gameplay.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Jean-Fred (talk) 18:46, 16 July 2010 (UTC)
Salut,
Pour développer un peu sur ce que j'ai indiqué sur la DR : j'avais remarqué ton schéma dès son upload, et il m'a tout de suite titillé. Je voulais t'en parler depuis pour te suggérer une version simplifiée, mais j'avoue que je ne sais pas du tout où situer la limite entre ok/pas ok. J'ai laissé traîner, et quand j'ai vu que World of Goo était en pBA, je me suis dit que ça pouvait plus attendre donc j'ai lancé une DR un peu à la hussarde, sans t'en avoir parlé amicalement d'abord et avec une motivation laconique. Tout ce que j'aime pas faire sur Commons en gros :-/ Désolé de te coller ça alors que tu est en pBA, c'est pas très très classe de ma part... Jean-Fred (talk) 23:20, 16 July 2010 (UTC)
- Non, ce n'est pas grave, j'avoue que la semaine après l'upload, j'attendais une remarque de ce type mais rien n'est venu. C'est vrai que la limite est un peu floue : même si l'image est simple et ne provient pas du jeu, elle l'imite grandement. Je ne savais pas non plus si ça pouvait passer ou pas. Il n'y qu'à attendre d'autre avis sur la page de discussion (elle est limitée dans le temps ou bien l'image n'est pas supprimée tant qu'il n'y a pas de consensus clair ?) pour voir si oui ou non il faut faire une version plus éloignée du style original. Nicosmos (talk) 15:04, 17 July 2010 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]A page has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this gallery, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
DrKiernan (talk) 09:45, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
File:Firefox_3.5_fr.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Vssun (talk) 06:48, 12 March 2011 (UTC)
File:Twitter 2012 logo.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Kelapstick (talk) 01:44, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
File:Mozilla Phoenix Logo.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
AVRS (talk) 21:58, 28 November 2013 (UTC)
Améliorer l’image: Petit_Monde_de_Gondry,_Jonze_&_Kaufman.svg
[edit]On peut améliorer l’image: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Petit_Monde_de_Gondry,_Jonze_%26_Kaufman.svg par utiliser Inkscape: voyez cet image: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Unflow_text.png. Fait comme ça. Wereldburger758 (talk) 09:33, 12 April 2014 (UTC)
- Bien vu, merci beaucoup ! Si je mets à jour cette image un jour, je ferais comme ça. ~ nicolas (talk) 09:48, 12 April 2014 (UTC)
File:Théâtre de l’Archipel (5829008091).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Culex (talk) 10:16, 27 April 2017 (UTC)
File:Théâtre de l’Archipel (5829015837).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Culex (talk) 10:16, 27 April 2017 (UTC)
File:Théâtre de l’Archipel (5829022251).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Culex (talk) 10:17, 27 April 2017 (UTC)
File:Théâtre de l’Archipel (5829037075).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Culex (talk) 10:17, 27 April 2017 (UTC)
File:Théâtre de l’Archipel (5829041871).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Culex (talk) 10:18, 27 April 2017 (UTC)
File:Théâtre de l’Archipel (5829080201).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Culex (talk) 10:18, 27 April 2017 (UTC)
File:Théâtre de l’Archipel (5829092057).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Culex (talk) 10:19, 27 April 2017 (UTC)
File:Théâtre de l’Archipel (5829046739).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Culex (talk) 10:19, 27 April 2017 (UTC)
File:Théâtre de l’Archipel (5829577844).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Culex (talk) 10:19, 27 April 2017 (UTC)
File:Firefox Logo, 2017.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
72.71.194.232 00:05, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
File:Opera 2015 logo.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
177.75.112.34 14:26, 7 December 2017 (UTC)
File tagging File:Je suis Charlie.svg
[edit]This media may be deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Je suis Charlie.svg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you. |
Ronhjones (Talk) 16:49, 20 January 2019 (UTC)
- @Ronhjones: : Can you explain the issue? The “Permission” field links to a message by the author of the image explicitly agreeing to release it under CC-0. I’m not sure why going through OTRS is needed in that case? ~ nicolas (talk) 17:36, 20 January 2019 (UTC)
- Sorry missed that one - I went all through https://twitter.com/joachimroncin/status/553110934777233409 and found nothing. Page fixed and reviewed. Ronhjones (Talk) 17:54, 20 January 2019 (UTC)
- Thank you. It’s true that it wasn’t clear that there were two different tweets. ~ nicolas (talk) 17:57, 20 January 2019 (UTC)
- Sorry missed that one - I went all through https://twitter.com/joachimroncin/status/553110934777233409 and found nothing. Page fixed and reviewed. Ronhjones (Talk) 17:54, 20 January 2019 (UTC)
- @Ronhjones: : Can you explain the issue? The “Permission” field links to a message by the author of the image explicitly agreeing to release it under CC-0. I’m not sure why going through OTRS is needed in that case? ~ nicolas (talk) 17:36, 20 January 2019 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
Yours sincerely, Arthur Crbz (talk) 22:10, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Cimabue Diptych Overview Simple FR.svg
[edit]Copyright status: File:Cimabue Diptych Overview Simple FR.svg
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Cimabue Diptych Overview Simple FR.svg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 14:25, 29 September 2019 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
Yours sincerely, Jonteemil (talk) 05:29, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Instagram logo has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
1.Ayana (talk) 15:46, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Mesejergp
[edit]Xxhhdj know 79.83.33.192 18:49, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
Messenger
[edit]messenger 31.30.160.120 00:05, 19 August 2023 (UTC)
Round 1 of Picture of the Year 2023 voting is open!
[edit]Dear Wikimedian,
Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2023 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighteenth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2023) to produce a single Picture of the Year.
Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.
For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topical categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you may vote for as many images as you like. The top 30 overall and top 5% of most popular images in each category will continue to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just three images to become the Picture of the Year.
Round 1 will end on UTC.
Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee
You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2022 Picture of the Year contest.
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:01, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2023 voting is open!
[edit]Read this message in your language
Dear Wikimedian,
You are receiving this message because we noticed that you previously voted in the Picture of the Year contest. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2023) to produce a single Picture of the Year.
Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.
In this second and final round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2023.
Round 2 will end at UTC.
If you have already voted for Round 2, please ignore this message.
Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:12, 16 October 2024 (UTC)