User talk:Wuzur

Leave a message on this page

Write a mail

en-3	This user is able to contribute with an advanced level of English.

de	Dieser Benutzer spricht Deutsch als Muttersprache.

This user is an administrator on Wikimedia Commons. (verify)

This user has a confirmed real life identity.

This page gets automatically archived.
Archive: 1

Deutsch | Español | Italian

Dear Wuzur. I am writing to you to inform you that you are in danger of losing your adminship on Commons because of inactivity.

If you want to keep your adminship, you need both to sign at Commons:Administrators/Inactivity section within 30 days of today's date, and also to make at least five further admin actions in the following six months. Anyone who does not do so will automatically lose administrator rights.

You can read the de-admin policy at Commons:Administrators/De-adminship.

Thank you abf «Cabale!» 15:28, 3 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Bei dem Foto handelt es sich keinesfalls um ein originales Modell der Fa. MÄRKLIN, vielmehr wurden Gehäuse und Treibgestell verschiedener Modelle im Selbstbau "kombiniert" — Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.1.114.70 (talk • contribs)

Das Modell kam so aus einer orginalverschlossenen Packung, auf der Märklin draufstand, dies ist nach besten Wissen ein Originalmodell. Wie kommst du darauf, dass die Lok nicht echt sein soll? —Wuzur 17:11, 9 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ich gehe auch mal davon aus, dass das tatsächlich ein Original ist, da gab's mal vor ein paar Jahren kurz vor Weihnachten eine Aktion bei Aldi, mit einer sehr einfachen Version einer Dampf- bzw. Diesellok, die sich nur im (Plastik-)Aufbau unterschieden. Ist keinesfalls mit dem Modell 3404 o.ä. zu verwechseln! a×p_de^Hello! 17:25, 15 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Wuzur. I am writing to you to inform you that you are in danger of losing your adminship on Commons because of inactivity.

If you want to keep your adminship, you need both to sign at Commons:Administrators/Inactivity section/Aug-Sep 2011 within 30 days of today's date, and also to make at least five further admin actions in the following six months. Anyone who does not do so will automatically lose administrator rights.

You can read the de-admin policy at Commons:Administrators/De-adminship.

Thank you a×p_de^Hello! 16:53, 15 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

P.S.: Komm schon, vier "actions" wirst Du doch sicherlich hinkriegen, schau z.B. mal in Category:Duplicate. Ja, ich weiß, das ist nicht immer einfach zu entscheiden, aber wenn jeder ein paar macht, dann sind wir umso schneller durch! Gruß :) a×p_de^Hello! 17:20, 15 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm, auf die Idee Dupliakte zu bearbeiten, bin ich nicht gekommen, ich hatte vorher ausschließlich Copyvios, etc. gelöscht, da müsste ich mich aber wieder einarbeiten. —Wuzur 18:06, 15 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Naja, war halt so 'ne Idee, im Prinzip egal was jeder macht, Hauptsache jeder macht ein bisschen was ;-) a×p_de^Hello! 18:32, 15 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Wuzur. I am writing to inform you that you are in danger of losing your adminship on Commons because of inactivity.

If you want to keep your adminship, you need both to sign at Commons:Administrators/Inactivity section within 30 days of today's date, and also to make at least five further admin actions in the following six months. Anyone who does not do so will automatically lose administrator rights.

You can read the de-admin policy at Commons:Administrators/De-adminship.

Thank you Trijnstel_talk 23:22, 5 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Wuzur. I am writing to inform you that you are in danger of losing your adminship on Commons because of inactivity.

If you want to keep your adminship, you need both to sign at Commons:Administrators/Inactivity section/Aug-Sep 2013 within 30 days of today's date, and also to make at least five further admin actions in the following six months. Anyone who does not do so will automatically lose administrator rights.

You can read the de-admin policy at Commons:Administrators/De-adminship.

Thank you – Kwj2772 (msg) 10:11, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Wuzur. You have new messages at Gunnex's talk page. You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ English ∙ español ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ हिन्दी ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ Tagalog ∙ Türkçe ∙ 简体中文 ∙ 繁體中文 ∙ +/−

• I commented additionally... ach, Mensch, Deutsch geht ja auch... also: auch Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Uzo19 kommentiert. Danke für die Arbeit. Grüsse. Gunnex (talk) 22:22, 21 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• ⧼Wikibase-terms/Wuzur⧽: Deutsch, Ελληνικά, English, ‎français, magyar, ‎italiano, македонски, ‎‎日本語, ‎‎‎русский, ‎‎‎svenska

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2013 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2013) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. The top 30 overall and the most popular image in each category have continued to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just one image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on 7 March 2014. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:MyLanguage/Commons:Picture_of_the_Year/2013/Introduction/en Click here to learn more and vote »]

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

This Picture of the Year vote notification was delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:23, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• In other languages: Deutsch, ‎español, ‎français, ‎日本語, Nederlands, русский, ‎svenska, ‎Türkçe, ‎українська

Dear Wuzur,

The 2013 Picture of the Year competition has ended and we are pleased to announce the results: We shattered participation records this year — more people voted in Picture of the Year 2013 than ever before. In both rounds, 4070 different people voted for their favorite images. Additionally, there were more image candidates (featured pictures) in the contest than ever before (962 images total).

• In the first round, 2852 people voted for all 962 files
• In the second round, 2919 people voted for the 50 finalists (the top 30 overall and top 2 in each category)

We congratulate the winners of the contest and thank them for creating these beautiful images and sharing them as freely licensed content:

1. 157 people voted for the winner, an image of a lightbulb with the tungsten filament smoking and burning.
2. In second place, 155 people voted for an image of "Sviati Hory" (Holy Mountains) National Park in Donetsk Oblast, Ukraine.
3. In third place, 131 people voted for an image of a swallow flying and drinking.

Click here to view the top images »

We also sincerely thank to all 4070 voters for participating and we hope you will return for next year's contest in early 2015. We invite you to continue to participate in the Commons community by sharing your work.

Thanks,
the Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:00, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I noticed you have set up User:MiszaBot to archive your talk page. Unfortunately, the bot has stopped working, and given how its operator is inactive, it is unclear when/if this will fixed. For the time being, I have volunteered to operate a MiszaBot clone (running the exact same code). With that said, your input would be appreciated at Commons:Bots/Requests/ArchiveBot 1. Regards, FASTILY 07:39, 20 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Wuzur, I am writing to inform you that you are in danger of losing your adminship on Commons because of inactivity.

If you want to keep your adminship, you need both to sign at Commons:Administrators/Inactivity section/Aug-Sep 2014 within 30 days of today's date, and also to make at least five further admin actions in the following six months. Anyone who does not do so will automatically lose administrator rights.

You can read the de-admin policy at Commons:Administrators/De-adminship.

Thank you, odder (talk) 20:11, 13 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Wuzur, danke für deine ausführliche und auch nachvollziehbare Löschbegründung hier.! Viele Grüße --An-d (talk) 06:09, 27 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Gerne. Wenn man schreibt, warum man etwas tut, gibt es erfahrungsgemäß weniger Streit. —Wuzur 07:44, 27 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Уважаемый Wuzur, Я изучил страницы других крупных советских военачальников, у них ситуация с фотографиями точно такая же. Но их фотографии размещены на их страницах. Хотя по законам Российской Федерации все удаленные фота могут использоваться в открытом доступе. Так как прошло более 70лет. Прошу востановить фотографии. Или дать мне полную информацию почему они удалены. (Dear Wuzur, I have studied the pages of other major Soviet military leaders, they have exactly the same the situation with photos . But their pictures posted on their pages. Although the laws of the Russian Federation, all deleted photos, may be used in the public domain. Because has passed more 70let. Ask You to restore photos. Or give me full information why they removed.)

Уважаемый Wuzur, Я изучил страницы других крупных советских военачальников, у них ситуация с фотографиями точно такая же. Но их фотографии размещены на их страницах. Хотя по законам Российской Федерации все удаленные фота могут использоваться в открытом доступе. Так как прошло более 70лет. Прошу востановить фотографии. Или дать мне полную информацию почему они удалены. (Dear Wuzur, I have studied the pages of other major Soviet military leaders, they have exactly the same the situation with photos . But their pictures posted on their pages. Although the laws of the Russian Federation, all deleted photos, may be used in the public domain. Because has passed more 70let. Ask You to restore photos. Or give me full information why they removed.)

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

• File:WuzurImage.svg

—LX (talk, contribs) 18:41, 22 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Wuzur, I am writing to inform you that you are in danger of losing your adminship on Commons because of inactivity.

If you want to keep your adminship, you need both to sign at Commons:Administrators/Inactivity section/Feb-Mar 2016 within 30 days of today's date, and also to make at least five further admin actions in the following six months. Anyone who does not do so will automatically lose administrator rights.

You can read the de-admin policy at Commons:Administrators/De-adminship.

Thank you, odder (talk) 22:25, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Wuzur, I am writing to inform you that you are in danger of losing your adminship on Commons because of inactivity.

If you want to keep your adminship, you need both to sign at Commons:Administrators/Inactivity section/Feb-Mar 2017 within 30 days of today's date, and also to make at least five further admin actions in the following six months. Anyone who does not do so will automatically lose administrator rights.

You can read the de-admin policy at Commons:Administrators/De-adminship.

Thank you, odder (talk) 02:17, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cercanias.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Teoamez (talk) 14:33, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dear {{subst:PAGENAME}}. I am writing to inform you that you are in danger of losing your adminship on Commons because of inactivity.

If you want to keep your adminship, you need both to sign at Commons:Administrators/Inactivity section within 30 days of today's date, and also to make at least five further admin actions in the following six months. Anyone who does not do so will automatically lose administrator rights.

You can read the de-admin policy at Commons:Administrators/De-adminship.

Thank you --B dash (talk) 02:29, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

In der Disk zum Löschantrag kann ich nicht entdecken, auf welcher objektiven/rechtlichen Grundlage dieser umgesetzt wurde.
Auch beim RAF-Fahndungsplakat wird dies verschwiegen. Das "see comment by syrcro" ist nämlich nicht vorhanden.
https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Fahndungsplakat_NSU.JPG --angerdan (talk) 16:33, 6 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Die Grundlage für die Löschungen steht ind den jeweiligen Diskussionen. Damit die Dateien hier verwendet werden dürfen, muss eine dieser Bedingungen zutreffen:

• Die Fotografen der auf den Plakaten verwendeten Bilder und die Abgebildeten müssen einer Veröffentlichung unter einer freien Lizenz zustimmen.
• Es muss eine urheberrechtliche Ausnahme geben, die eine freie Verwendung der Bilder dennoch zulässt. Insbesondere müssen Bearbeitungen erlaubt sein.

Beides ist hier nicht der Fall. —Wuzur 22:54, 6 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Die Grundlage der Löschung steht leider nicht in der Diskussion, nur die Rechtslage welche die Nutzung erlaubt.

Die Löschdiskussionen waren mehrheitlich nicht für eine Löschung, gelöscht wurde jedoch trotzdem.

Da alles Personen der Zeitgeschichte sind, ist eine Zustimmung nicht erforderlich. Zudem ist der Großteil der abgebildeten Personen entweder nicht in Deutschland gemeldet oder bereits verstorben.

Die Fotografien wurden durch eine Behörde veröffentlicht, was die Frage nach einer Namensnennung des Urhebers laut EuGH-Entscheidung zum Urheberrecht an Fahndungsfotos entfallen lässt.

"...seien die Fotos ... seinerzeit aber durch eine Sicherheitsbehörde erstmalig veröffentlicht worden. In diesem Falle hätte die Nennung der betreffenden Behörde als Quelle genügt. Eine ausdrückliche Nennung der Urheberin wäre dann nicht notwendig gewesen."

https://www.123recht.net/ratgeber/urheberrecht/EuGH-Entscheidung-zum-Urheberrecht-an-Fahndungsfotos-__a110799.html --angerdan (talk) 07:11, 7 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]